I have just been watching Matt_Janda's Optimal Flop Play, Part 1.
He suggests that the GTO ratio of bluffs to raises is 3:2.
I was under the impression (I got this fro Ed Miller videos and I may be completely off the mark from what was said in these videos) that the GTO ratio of bluffs to value was 1:2
3:2 has more bluffs that values in the range
1:2 has more values than bluffs in the range.
Could someone offer me more of an explanation as to why we are raising more bluffs than value because it seems to me that if there are more bluffs than value in our range our opponent can come over the top with impunity.