What a Complete Joke
I'll start with the obvious: American's don't care about soccer. That's not a surprise to anyone. Its on at weird times for us, and its a little slower than our other sports which doesn't help in the eyes of Americans with short attention spans. But nonetheless, plenty of us do start paying attention every 4 years because the USA national team generally does pretty well at the World Cup. A lot of Americans also recognize the superb athleticism and do appreciate the talent, some of these guys are without question some of the top athletes in the world. There's also a deep level of strategy that once you understand a little of it, is pretty cool and entertaining. I also respect soccer because as my wife pointed out, its the least elitist big time sport in the world. It requires zero equipment to learn how to play, and skills can be developed without even a pair of shoes. Obviously thats a big reason its the world's sport, and deservedly so. Its simple rules, accessibility, and underlying deep strategy and talent base make it a great game, there's no question about that. So please don't confuse this blog to be about soccer, its not, its about FIFA, the governing body of the World Cup and the other top international leagues.
This year especially there are plenty of reasons for Americans to be excited about soccer, Landon Donovon is in his prime, Tim Howard is a phenomenal keeper, and the games are on at reasonable hours on normal channels , so we don't have to get up at 4am to watch our guys play, because lets face it, that just wasn't going to happen. Our tournamnet even started strong with an upset tie against England.
So it was all great until this absolutely ridiculous call that disallowed Maurice Edu's game winning goal today. No commentator saw anything, but it was hard to miss the 2 Americans being bear hugged while Edu was busy winning the game. So naturally, when it was disallowed, I naturally, along with every other American watching, wanted to know what the call was and who it was called on, no one mentions either, and I remain confused. After the game, I find out that these refs don't actually have to specify what the call is or even who its on. Are you kidding me?!?! I'm still blown away by that. I was informed by our friend goretexg in the forum that Sepp Blatter, FIFA's corrupt head, is adamantly opposed to any form of instant replay. But that's not event the main absurdity here, but we'll get to that in a minute.
I did a little googling of "FIFA corruption" and there hundreds of articles detailing various investigations into FIFA regarding payoffs, kickbacks, bribes, and sleazy ticket hocking. These investigations finger people all the way to the top, including Sepp Blatter, FIFA's head. For our non-US friends, I'm sure this is common knowledge for you guys and you're probably very surprised I'm just now outraged about all this. But again, Americans check in on the sport every 4 years for the World Cup, and for the most we don't pay attention because corruption in FIFA, or any soccer news for that matter, never ever hits our sports headlines. So anyway, yeah there's a ton of corruption, most of it appears to be pretty brazen and blatant on the organizational level.
So now this all makes sense. If FIFA has a culture of corruption, then why would they WANT the refs to have to record against who or what the foul is? Because this little rule as it is opens up the entire sport to incredible poisoning, making it so much easier for an official to hide his intent of turning the game one way or the other. A billion people are expected to watch the world cup. I'm sure that comes with incredible action and unparalleled incentive to buy the results of games. Russian and Chinese mobsters that are have hundreds of millions dollars could easily make that happen. And its probably the easiest sport to manipulate with such an archaic rule set. This rule is so outrageous to the spirit of fair competition, that I can't imagine that FIFA doesn't WANT to invite in the corruption, poisoning, and controversy. Because its just too easy and to obvious to fix. "Refs now have to disclose what infraction they are calling, and what player is being penalized." Done.
Next, theres FIFA's adamant refusal to utilize any sort of instant replay. If FIFA had any interest at all in making sure the outcome of these games was fair, then why NOT put in instant replay? Instant replay has made Tennis, American Football, and the NHL much better and fairer. The challenge system works great in Tennis and football, and the NHL has a board of people in the Toronto headquarters standing by to review video for EVERY single game played. Close calls get elevated to the headquarters, they decide after looking at all the angles, and thats the decision. And thats just the little ol' NHL, which is eclipsed in North American in revenue and popularity by baseball, basketball, and football.
But right now we're talking about the World Cup, the biggest sporting event in the history of the world, how could you possibly resist rules that ensure fairer outcomes, if you don't have a monetary interest in to the contrary? It's such an asinine stance that again, its just impossible to imagine another reason why they aren't for it except for their culture of corruption and graft, and that someone or everyone is on the take to keep it from happening. After all, it would certainly make it harder to fix games if an independent board of review were reviewing close calls outside the authority of the on field refs.
Even I remember the controversy over the refs in the 2002 world cup where the Italians got jammed. How many upset wins or upset ties have there been in this year's tournament alone? After seeing that goal get disallowed, and how FIFA has handled it so far ("no comment" from anyone), how can I even watch another game under the assumption that the outcome is not predetermined? The more I read and learn about FIFA, the more disgusted I am. I can't help but see my suspicions exemplified every time there's a big upset or a hugely controversial call.
Honestly, I feel cheated not only for the American team, but for myself for having started to care and pay attention in the first place. Its obviously a huge waste of time considering not even the most basic measures are taken to protect the integrity of the game by its governing body. I also feel badly for the fans elsewhere, this tournament means so much to so many people (most of them are outside the US), that its simply a tragedy that its being run by these assholes who clearly have no concern to even an interest in keeping the sport pure.
So you know what FIFA? American's shouldn't care about soccer, because obviously you don't. Wait, thats not quite fair. You don't care about the GAME of soccer or the World Cup and what it means to so many people, but you obviously love the money attached to it. The game, the fans, and the World Cup tournament are simply ways to funnel in some easy, under the table, tax free revenue. Because if you actually cared about the game one iota, these ridiculous rules would not be in place, period.





Copyright ©2009-2010 Drag The Bar LLC. All Rights Reserved
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
I just finished a job for an older man that was born and raised in Holland. Of course his first choice is Holland, but his second was the American team. As I worked, I listened to him yell loudly at the officials (television screen) as this all unfolded. I don’t know the first thing about soccer really, but after listening to his argument, and then yours, I think I’m glad I never got involved.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
It’s the same with FIDE. Probably the same at the UN. I think alot of the smaller countries have a culture of corruption where it’s common and accepted.
At least the ref didn’t take away somebody’s perfect game.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
I agree Hunter, totally bad for the game and a total turnoff and disservice to the world, and especially America. But I still have to watch
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
ok, have to get in as a non-US guy (german guy), where soccer is about the biggest sport.
Instant replay
That topic is getting started after every big mistake of a ref in soccer and has been discussed a lot in german tv for our national soccer league. its (since years) still in discussion and many ppl dont want that replay because soccer is a continously game with a normal flow and momentum for a team (like in poker) and with those replays, this flow would be damaged.
E.g. you cant check, if someone stays in offside afterwards. Those decisions are always nowbased (dont now better word) decisions and cant be judged afterwards.
Without pointing out many reasons, for the most part (99.X% of the time) an instant-replay is really not neccessary and would damage more, then the benefits of avoiding a mistake.
Reporting for a ref
Hmmm… I didnĀ“t know, that refs at the world cup dont have to report their decisions. In our national league / european cups its normal, that the refs have to write a report afterwards, where they explain their decisions. In our national TV its normal, that refs have to give interviews after the games and explain mistakes detailed.
Refs at world cup
The refs are a big problem at this years world cup IMO. Not because they are bought or want to destroy the game, because they judge so ****in differently and often destroy any game-flow. There is a simple rule for a ref: “If you dont talk about a ref after a game, he made a good game” and at this years world cup, after every 2nd game there is a discussion about the ref.
Since the FIFA wants to integrate all nations to the world cup, they get refs from all over the world, but some of them are a little bit overextended or take a judging-line which is pretty bad.
I can understand your disappointment about the US-goal, but thats just part of soccer. We germans had also really bad luck with the ref yesterday (in my opinion), but what can u do? The world cup is still a great thing and nice to watch.
Dont fold too early, just call and reevaluate on turn, hunter
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
Hi, all. When I read ‘What a Complete Joke’ I assumed you were talking about England’s game against Algeria. Having a goal disallowed (wrongly) is nothing compared to sitting through 90 minutes of pain watching England play (?)
I’m just glad that I have a German grandmother, so a couple of games into any World cup or Euro championship, I can evoke my German citizenship.
TV replay debate: Yes.
Replays are flashed on screen seconds after the event, from many different angles. The viewer is watching them as the players are still arguing with the ref.
There is still a margin of error, as sometimes they are inconclusive. But more correct decisions would be made. Which is a good thing.
The argument that it would slow the game down is a valid point. However, if both teams only have two appeals per game. I think it is a small price to pay.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
Yeah I love soccer and was very excited for the world cup. It completely takes the wind out of you. It feels like you are just not allowed to move on.
As for corruption in soccer, soccer is like the nuber 1 sport in 97% of the world. When like 5.8 billion people love something, there will be a good amount that want to control the results either for profit or to make their team win.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
Hunter, that’s really cool that you’re open about having Tourette’s. Obviously it hasn’t slowed you down any. I’ve had to deal with my own share of psychiatric surprises. The only thing I really dislike about all that is the shallow people, who see that you’re different and judge you as screwed up or bad, when inside you could be coping heroically with something they couldn’t imagine, something you have no control over. Everybody has problems, character is how you deal with them. Also, I hope you take this in the very friendly way it’s meant, but I could be anywhere in the world, and if I heard somebody say ‘What IS up?’, I would know it was you.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
And talking about opportunities for instant replay, there’s always the Hand of God score from the 86 Cup.
I’m not very knowledgeable about soccer so I hope I got that right.
June 18th, 2010 - 15:36
Great blog, great article, and horrible ref. It sucks when refs make bad calls that determine the outcome of a game, but it’s part of every game, even ones with instant replay. What shouldn’t be part of the game is refs intentionally making bad calls because they’re getting bribed or coerced. It’s inexcusable for FIFA to maintain rules that facilitate this behaviour. (I think I just spelled behavior with a ‘u’ because I’m talking about soccer.)